The subject of geophysical fluid dynamics deals with the dynamics of the atmosphere and the ocean. Motions within these fluid masses are intimately connected through continual exchanges of momentum, heat, and moisture, and cannot be considered separately on a global scale. The field has been largely developed by meteorologists and oceanographers, but non-specialists have also been interested in the subject. Taylor was not a geophysical fluid dynamicist, but he held the position of a meteorologist for some time, and through this involvement he developed a special interest in the problems of turbulence and instability. Although Prandtl was mainly interested in the engineering aspects of fluid mechanics, his well-known textbook (
Prandtl, 1952) contains several sections dealing with meteorological aspects of fluid mechanics. Notwithstanding the pressure for technical specialization, it is worthwhile to learn something of this fascinating field even if one’s primary interest is in another area of fluid mechanics.
Together the atmosphere and ocean have a large and consequential impact on humanity. The combined dynamics of the atmosphere and ocean are leading contributors to global climate. We all live within the atmosphere and are almost helplessly affected by the weather and its rather chaotic behavior that modulates agricultural success. Ocean currents effect navigation, fisheries, and pollution disposal. Populations that occupy coastlines can do little to prevent hurricanes, typhoons, or tsunamis. Thus, understanding and reliably predicting geophysical fluid dynamic events and trends are scientific, economic, humanitarian, and even political priorities. This chapter provides the basic elements necessary for developing an understanding of geophysical fluid dynamics.
The two features that distinguish geophysical fluid dynamics from other areas of fluid dynamics are the rotation of the earth and vertical density stratification of the media. These two effects dominate the dynamics to such an extent that entirely new classes of phenomena arise, which have no counterpart in the laboratory-scale flows emphasized in the preceding chapters. (For example, the dominant mode of flow in the atmosphere and the ocean is
along the lines of constant pressure, not from high to low pressures.) The motion of the atmosphere and the ocean is naturally studied in a coordinate frame rotating with the earth. This gives rise to the Coriolis acceleration (see
Section 4.7). The density stratification gives rise to buoyancy forces (
Section 4.11 and
Chapter 8). In addition, important relevant material includes vorticity, boundary layers, instability, and turbulence (
Chapters 5,
10,
11, and
12). The reader should be familiar with these topics before proceeding further with the present chapter.
Because the Coriolis acceleration and fluid stratification play dominating roles in both the atmosphere and the ocean, there is a great deal of similarity between the dynamics of these two media; this makes it possible to study them together. There are also significant differences, however. For example the effects of lateral boundaries, due to the presence of continents, are important in the ocean but less so in the atmosphere. The intense currents (like the Gulf Stream and the Kuroshio) along the western ocean boundaries have no atmospheric analog. On the other hand phenomena like cloud formation and latent heat release due to moisture condensation are solely atmospheric phenomena. Plus, processes are generally slower in the ocean, in which a typical horizontal velocity is 0.1 m/s, although velocities
of the order of 1–2 m/s are found within the intense western boundary currents. In contrast, typical velocities in the atmosphere are 10–20 m/s. The nomenclature can also be different in the two fields. Meteorologists refer to a flow directed to the west as an “easterly wind” (i.e.,
from the east), while oceanographers refer to such a flow as a “westward current.” Atmospheric scientists refer to vertical positions by
heights measured upward from the earth’s surface, while oceanographers refer to
depths measured downward from the sea surface. In this chapter, the vertical coordinate
z increases upward, following the atmospheric science convention.
The rotational effects arising from the Coriolis acceleration have opposite signs in the two hemispheres. Note that all figures and descriptions given here are valid for the northern hemisphere. In some cases the sense of the rotational effect for the southern hemisphere has been explicitly mentioned. When the sense of the rotational effect is left unspecified for the southern hemisphere, it should be assumed as opposite to that in the northern hemisphere.
Example 13.1
The fluids (air & water) and velocities (a few cm/s to tens of m/s) involved in geophysical fluid mechanics are the same as those of many laboratory flows. However, the length scales of geophysical flows are considerably larger. Calculate the Reynolds numbers associated with two relatively small-scale geophysical phenomena: (i) a single-cell thunderstorm 10 km in diameter with a vertical velocity of 5 m/s, and (ii) a 100-m-wavelength deep-ocean water wave having an amplitude of 4 m. Are both flows turbulent? Should they be?
Solution
For the thunderstorm, the Reynolds number should be computed using the radius of the rising column of air and a mid-troposphere (z ≈ 5 km) value of the kinematic viscosity since such storms may span the troposphere:
Re=U(D/2)ν≅(5m/s)(5×103m)2.2×10−5m2/s∼109
This is a free shear flow driven by buoyancy and it has some of the character of a buoyant plume, so at this high Reynolds number it is most-definitely turbulent.
For the water wave, the characteristic fluid velocity within the wave, ωA, is set by the wave's frequency from (8.28), ω2 = 2πg/λ, and the wave's amplitude A. This leads to:
Re=ωAλν=[2πg/λ]1/2Aλν=[2πgλ]1/2Aν=[2π(9.81m/s2)100m]1/2(4m)1.×10−6m2/s∼3×108.
In spite of this high Reynolds number, the water motion associated with such a wave may be well described by potential flow. Thus, the high Reynolds number in this case indicates that such waves see only miniscule viscous lossless and therefore may travel enormous distances without much amplitude decay (see
Exercise 8.12).